Playing time. It’s one of the biggest issues in youth sports today.
And your kid might be doing everything right.
Showing up for practice.
Working hard.
Supporting teammates.
But what happens when all their hard work isn’t translating into playing time? Or when the roster is so deep, they’re not getting enough game-speed reps?
Frustration for both parent and child. And rightfully so.
The Aspen Institute’s Project Play recommends that sports programs (i.e., rec programs) invest in every kid equally, including playing time, through age 12 at least. But this becomes difficult when the demand outweighs the supply (i.e., deep rosters) or the coach/culture prioritizes winning.
The argument for equal playing time is simple: Research shows that when it comes to their sports experience, what kids want most is to be IN ON THE ACTION.
And getting stuck at the end of the bench doesn’t foster participation or development.
In fact, according to data from the Sports & Fitness Industry Association in the Aspen Institute’s State of Play 2017 report, only 37 percent of kids ages 6 to 12 regularly played team sports in 2016, down from 45 percent in 2008.
The numbers don’t lie; lack of playing time leads to kids quitting.
The entire purpose of practicing is so players can execute what they’re learning in a game setting.
And while we all understand that practice is valuable, “putting it all together” can only happen when kids experience real game situations.
Here’s why:
When players do not get meaningful minutes, the gap between them and their more active teammates widens. This isn’t just about skill level; it’s about the overall growth from involvement in the game.
Kids who are sidelined miss out on opportunities to experience success, learn from failure, and improve in real time. Without game experience, they can stagnate, and what could have been a minor skill gap turns into a significant developmental divide.
As Coach Jon Nascimento highlights, consistent game experience is crucial: A player cannot fully master a concept until they have attempted and successfully executed it several times in competitive matches.
Large rosters and prioritized winning often lead to a tighter rotation where only the top players see the court. However, this approach overlooks the long-term impact on players who are left out.
They’re not just losing playing time—they’re losing the chance to learn, improve, and eventually contribute at a higher level. Even in highly competitive teams, there are ways to ensure that all players get the game experience they need.
The common argument is that more practice time is the key to developing skills. Experts like USA Hockey and top soccer academies recommend a practice-to-game ratio of 3:1 or even 5:1 (USA Hockey, Coyle).
These guidelines emphasize the importance of quality practice over the number of games. But this recommendation can be misinterpreted. It’s not saying games are unimportant; it’s saying that overloading kids with games without proper skill development isn’t beneficial.
So, for those sitting on the bench or missing minutes, it’s not a matter of replacing game time with more practice. They need opportunities to apply their skills in real games.
Practice develops skills; games test them and teach players how to use them under real conditions.
Youth sports are about development, not just winning. Players need the opportunity to test their skills in real-game situations, gain confidence, and learn how to perform under pressure.
By helping your child find opportunities for meaningful game-time minutes, you’re investing in your child’s long-term growth as an athlete and as a person.
REGISTER